Server-to-server app conversion tracking is more reliable than SDKs because it eliminates the risk of data loss due to ad blockers or device limitations.
As mobile advertising continues to grow, it’s essential for businesses to track their app conversions. Server-to-server app conversion tracking and the use of SDKs are two methods available for app conversion tracking. However, server-to-server app conversion tracking offers a range of benefits that make it a better option for businesses. In this article, we’ll explore why server-to-server app conversion tracking is beneficial, how it works, and how it compares to using an SDK.
Firstly, one of the significant benefits of using server-to-server app conversion tracking is that it reduces data discrepancies. Data discrepancies can occur when using SDKs because they rely on the device's local time, which can be inaccurate. In contrast, server-to-server app conversion tracking uses server time, which is more accurate and reduces the chance of data discrepancies.
Another benefit of server-to-server app conversion tracking is that it offers more flexibility in tracking conversions. With SDKs, businesses have to rely on the limited number of events provided by the platform. However, server-to-server app conversion tracking allows businesses to track custom events, giving them more flexibility in tracking conversions that are specific to their business.
In addition, server-to-server app conversion tracking is more reliable than using SDKs. SDKs can be affected by ad-blocking software, which can prevent the SDK from tracking conversions. On the other hand, server-to-server app conversion tracking is not affected by ad-blocking software, making it a more reliable option.
Furthermore, server-to-server app conversion tracking offers better accuracy in tracking conversions across different devices. SDKs rely on the device's IDFA or GAID, which can change if users reset their device or disable tracking. In contrast, server-to-server app conversion tracking relies on a unique identifier, such as a user ID or transaction ID, which remains constant across different devices.
Another advantage of server-to-server app conversion tracking is that it provides businesses with more control over their data. With SDKs, businesses have to rely on the platform's dashboard for reporting and analysis. In contrast, server-to-server app conversion tracking allows businesses to access their raw data, giving them more control over their data and enabling them to perform more in-depth analysis.
In addition, server-to-server app conversion tracking is more secure than using SDKs. SDKs can be vulnerable to fraud because they rely on the device's local time and IDFA or GAID, which can be manipulated by fraudsters. On the other hand, server-to-server app conversion tracking is less vulnerable to fraud because it uses server time and a unique identifier that is less susceptible to manipulation.
Moreover, server-to-server app conversion tracking is more scalable than using SDKs. SDKs require businesses to integrate with each ad network individually, which can be time-consuming and challenging to manage. In contrast, server-to-server app conversion tracking requires businesses to integrate only once with their tracking partner, making it a more scalable option for businesses.
Additionally, server-to-server app conversion tracking offers better privacy for users. SDKs can collect user data, such as the IDFA or GAID, which can be used for targeted advertising. On the other hand, server-to-server app conversion tracking does not collect user data, making it a better option for businesses that prioritize user privacy.
Furthermore, server-to-server app conversion tracking is easier to implement than using SDKs. SDKs require businesses to integrate the SDK into their app, which can be complex and time-consuming. In contrast, server-to-server app conversion tracking requires businesses to add a simple code snippet to their server, making it a more straightforward option for businesses.
In conclusion, server-to-server app conversion tracking offers a range of benefits that make it a better option for businesses than using SDKs. It reduces data discrepancies, offers more flexibility in tracking conversions, is more reliable and accurate, provides businesses with more control over their data, is more secure and scalable, offers better privacy for users, and is easier to implement. Businesses that prioritize accurate and reliable app conversion tracking should consider using server-to-server app conversion tracking for their mobile advertising campaigns.
1. Accurate Data: One of the main benefits of using server-to-server app conversion tracking is that it provides accurate data. Since the conversion data is sent directly from the server to the ad network or analytics platform, there is no room for error or discrepancies that can occur with SDK-based tracking. This makes the data more reliable and helps marketers make better decisions based on the insights derived from it.
2. Faster Implementation: Another benefit of server-to-server app conversion tracking is that it is faster to implement than an SDK. With an SDK, developers need to integrate the code into the app, which can take time and effort. In contrast, server-to-server tracking only requires a simple API integration, making it quicker and easier to set up.
3. Improved Privacy: Server-to-server app conversion tracking also offers improved privacy compared to SDK-based tracking. With an SDK, user data is collected directly from the device, which can raise privacy concerns. However, with server-to-server tracking, no personal data is collected, ensuring that user privacy is protected.
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
| Server-to-Server App Conversion Tracking | SDK-Based Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | High | Low |
| Implementation | Fast | Slow |
| Privacy | High | Low |
| Cost | High | Low |
| Compatibility | May not work with all ad networks or analytics platforms | Works with most ad networks and analytics platforms |
Are you looking for a more efficient way to track app conversions? If so, then you might want to consider using a server-to-server app conversion tracking system. Unlike SDKs, server-to-server tracking allows you to track conversions without requiring users to install an app or provide personal data. In this article, we will explore the various benefits of using server-to-server app conversion tracking over an SDK.
One of the main benefits of using server-to-server tracking is that it provides more accurate data than SDKs. This is because server-to-server tracking does not rely on device IDs or cookies, which can be easily deleted or reset by users. Instead, it uses more reliable data sources, such as IP addresses and browser fingerprints, to track conversions. As a result, you can get more precise information about your app's performance and user behavior.
Another advantage of server-to-server tracking is that it is faster and easier to implement than SDKs. With SDKs, you need to integrate the tracking code into your app and update it regularly to stay current with new technologies and platforms. On the other hand, server-to-server tracking only requires you to set up a server-side API that can receive conversion data from various sources. This means you can start tracking conversions right away without any coding or technical skills.
Server-to-server tracking is also more cost-effective than SDKs. With SDKs, you need to pay for the development and maintenance of the tracking code, as well as the storage and processing of user data. With server-to-server tracking, you only need to pay for the server space and bandwidth used to transmit conversion data. This can result in significant cost savings for your business, especially if you have a large number of users or high-volume conversions.
Privacy is a growing concern for many users, and server-to-server tracking offers a more privacy-friendly solution than SDKs. With SDKs, you need to collect and store user data on your servers, which can be vulnerable to hacking or misuse. With server-to-server tracking, you only receive conversion data that has been anonymized and stripped of personal information. This means you can track conversions without compromising the privacy of your users.
Server-to-server tracking also offers cross-platform compatibility, which means you can track conversions across multiple devices and platforms. With SDKs, you are limited to tracking conversions within your app and on specific platforms, such as iOS or Android. With server-to-server tracking, you can track conversions from any device or platform that sends conversion data to your API. This can help you gain a more comprehensive view of your app's performance and user behavior.
Finally, server-to-server tracking offers greater scalability than SDKs. With SDKs, you need to update and maintain the tracking code for every new version of your app or platform. With server-to-server tracking, you only need to update your API to accommodate new sources of conversion data. This makes it much easier to scale your tracking system as your business grows and evolves.
In conclusion, server-to-server app conversion tracking offers several significant advantages over SDKs. It provides more accurate data, faster implementation, lower cost, more privacy-friendly, cross-platform compatibility, and greater scalability. If you are looking for a more efficient and effective way to track app conversions, you should definitely consider using server-to-server tracking.
Server-to-server app conversion tracking is a method of tracking app installs and events without requiring an SDK to be integrated into the app itself. Instead, it relies on server-side data to track conversions, making it a more reliable and accurate way of measuring app performance.
There are several benefits to using server-to-server app conversion tracking over an SDK:
By relying on server-side data, server-to-server app conversion tracking provides a more accurate measure of app performance. This is because it eliminates the risk of discrepancies between the data collected by the SDK and the data collected by the server.
Since server-to-server app conversion tracking doesn't require an SDK to be integrated into the app, it keeps sensitive user data more secure. This is because the data is collected and processed on the server instead of being stored on the user's device.
Server-to-server app conversion tracking can also improve overall app performance by reducing the amount of data that needs to be sent back and forth between the app and the server. This can lead to faster load times and a smoother user experience.
Finally, server-to-server app conversion tracking can be easier to implement than an SDK-based solution. This is because it doesn't require any changes to be made to the app itself, which can save time and resources during the development process.